8 comments

  • ortusdux 48 minutes ago
  • Bengalilol 2 minutes ago
  • stetrain 28 minutes ago
    Some DOTs have given official support to Tactical Urbanism, with methods for communities to propose and implement small projects themselves on accelerated timelines like bike lanes or pedestrian crosswalks.
    • baoooooooooooo 10 minutes ago
      It’s effectively crowdsourcing urban planning, I’m in support.

      I honestly think if we invited this type of empowerment/interaction in the physical world a bit more it would probably be good for spurring creativity in society (I think we do a pretty good job of it in software). It’s just a nice reminder that everything is just made up by someone else, likely no smarter than you.

      Also I can’t believe this was 10 years ago lol

  • moebrowne 10 minutes ago
  • irjoe 39 minutes ago
    Title needs (2016) appending
  • jgbuddy 24 minutes ago
    if you want it done right, you often have to do it yourself
  • bragr 19 minutes ago
    There's another side of stuff like this. People living up in the hills above LA near trail heads will put up fake no parking zones in front of their houses. People have gotten real tickets in fake zones.
    • riffic 9 minutes ago
      a counterexample of good tactical urbanism in Los Angeles People's Vision Zero, a group painting crosswalks where the city itself won't budge on safety demands (motonormativity is the rule)

      https://www.reddit.com/r/BikeLA/comments/1pl8guj/i_started_a...

      • GaryBluto 3 minutes ago
        >painting crosswalks where the city itself won't budge

        So, political vandals?

        • riffic 1 minute ago
          direct action gets the goods
          • GaryBluto 0 minutes ago
            But people obviously don't want the "goods", by and large. Otherwise the city would budge.
  • luqtas 51 minutes ago
    what an absurd the hipster population taking over spaces of deadly, noisy and polluting vehicles and having the state collaborating with them /j